| 17 | 0 | 33 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为研究机场地勤设备运行过程中产生的污染物对空气质量及环境的影响,以某国际机场为研究对象,根据主要用途将地勤设备分为17类并统计地勤设备的排放标准,提出地勤设备关键运行参数计算方法,采集实时运行数据,计算地勤设备常用运行车速、负载因子及污染物年排放并分析排放特性,探讨机场地勤设备电动化升级的可行性,对比分析将现有燃油行李车升级为符合国六排放标准的新设备与替换为纯电动行李车两种策略的经济效益、环保效益和使用便利性。研究结果表明:1)在17种类型地勤设备燃油车中,污染物年排放排名前5的地勤设备为行李车、航餐车、飞机牵引车、跑道维护车和地勤代步车,5类地勤设备的CO、HC、NOx、PM2.5、PM10的年排放量分别占年排放总量的76.3%、80.0%、63.3%、85.3%、85.5%。2)该机场将现有行李车更换为符合国六排放标准的新设备,CO、HC、NOx、PM2.5、PM10的年排放分别减小23.1%、15.4%、37.2%、43.2%、43.1%。3)采用电动行李车比采用国六排放标准燃油行李车的初期投入多8万元,但年度能源成本和年度维护成本的节省费用分别为16 500元和357元,投资回收期约4.75 a,电动行李车初期投入较高,但在整个生命周期内运营成本较低,经济效益更明显;电动化地勤设备在运行中不产生NOx等有害物质,且产生的噪声比同功率燃油车可减小10~20 dB;电动化地勤设备的人工维护成本较低且采用无级变速传动结构,有效提高地勤设备运行可靠性,降低驾驶员劳动强度。
Abstract:To investigate the impact of pollutants generated from the operation of airport ground support equipment(GSE) on air quality and the environment, taking an international airport as the research object, ground support equipment is classified into 17 categories according to their primary purposes, and the emission standards of ground support equipment are statistically analyzed. A calculation method for key operating parameters of ground support equipment is proposed, real-time operational data are collected, and the commonly used operating speeds, load factors, and annual pollutant emissions of ground support equipment are calculated to analyze emission characteristics. The feasibility of electrification upgrade for airport ground support equipment is explored, and a comparative analysis is conducted on the economic benefits, environmental benefits, and operational convenience of two strategies: upgrading existing baggage carts to new equipment complying with China′s National VI Emission Standard versus replacing them with pure electric baggage carts. The research results indicate: 1) Among the 17 types of fuel-powered ground support equipment, the top 5 ground support equipment in terms of annual pollutant emissions are baggage carts, catering trucks, aircraft tow tractors, runway maintenance vehicles, and ground support shuttle vehicles. The annual emissions of CO, HC, NOx, PM2.5, and PM10 from these 5 types of ground support equipment account for 76.3%, 80.0%, 63.3%, 85.3%, and 85.5% of the total annual emissions, respectively. 2)When the airport replaces existing baggage carts with new equipment complying with China′s National VI Emission Standard, the annual emissions of CO, HC, NOx, PM2.5, and PM10 are reduced by 23.1%, 15.4%, 37.2%, 43.2%, and 43.1%, respectively. 3) The initial investment for electric baggage carts is 80 000 yuan more than that for China′s National VI Emission Standard fuel baggage carts, but the annual energy cost savings and annual maintenance cost savings are 16 500 yuan and 357 yuan, respectively, with a payback period of approximately 4.75 years. Electric baggage carts have higher initial investment but lower operating costs throughout their entire lifecycle, demonstrating more significant economic benefits. Electric ground support equipment does not produce harmful substances such as NOx during operation, and the noise generated is 10-20 dB lower than fuel vehicles of the same power. Electric ground support equipment has lower manual maintenance costs and adopts continuously variable transmission structure, improving the operational reliability of ground support equipment and reducing driver labor intensity.
[1] LIU Z,DENG Z,DAVIS S J,et al.Monitoring global carbon emissions in 2021[J].Nature Reviews Earth & Environment,2022,3(4):217-219.
[2] 张田,田勇.中国民航飞机大气污染物和碳排放清单估算[J].中国环境科学,2023,43(10):5614-5623.
[3] PHOENIX D,KHODAYARI A,WUEBBLES D,et al.Aviation impact on air quality present day and mid-century simulated in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM)[J].Atmospheric Environment,2019,196:125-132.
[4] 储燕萍.上海浦东国际机场飞机尾气排放对机场附近空气质量的影响[J].环境监控与预警,2013,5(4):50-52.
[5] 李淇.中国道路移动源大气污染物和碳排放协同控制途径研究[D].北京:华北电力大学,2023.
[6] 陈思旭.重庆市新能源汽车替代使用的健康收益价值评估[D].昆明:云南大学,2019.
[7] 单丽,江飞,贺晓婧,等.中国道路交通源大气污染的健康影响评估[J].中国环境管理,2018,10(5):59-64.
[8] WU R S,ZHONG L J,HUANG X L,et al.Temporal variations in ambient particulate matter reduction associated short-term mortality risks in Guangzhou,China:a time-series analysis (2006—2016)[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,645:491-498.
[9] 韩博,王立婕,赵芸婷,等.郑州新郑国际机场本地化排放因子与排放清单[J].环境科学学报,2022,42(9):419-429.
[10] MASIOL M,HARRISON R M.Aircraft engine exhaust emissions and other airport-related contributions to ambient air pollution:a review[J].Atmospheric Environment,2014,95:409-455.
[11] 夏卿.飞机发动机排放对机场大气环境影响评估研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2009.
[12] 曹惠玲,李玉铭,晏嘉伟,等.基于修正Gaussian Puff模型的飞机LTO循环PM2.5排放及扩散特性研究[J].环境科学学报,2022,42(3):352-361.
[13] 曹惠玲,晏嘉伟,匡家骏,等.飞机排放对机场周边环境的影响研究[J].航空动力学报,2023,38(10):2501-2515.
[14] 黄清凤,陈桂浓,胡丹心,等.广州白云国际机场飞机大气污染物排放分析[J].环境监测管理与技术,2014,26(3):57-59.
[15] 徐冉,郎建垒,杨孝文,等.首都国际机场飞机排放清单的建立[J].中国环境科学,2016,36(8):2554-2560.
[16] TURGUT E T,CAVCAR M,USANMAZ O,et al.Investigating actual landing and takeoff operations for time-in-mode,fuel and emissions parameters on domestic routes in Turkey[J].Transportation Research Part D:Transport and Environment,2017,53:249-262.
[17] ZHANG J R,ZHANG S J,ZHANG X L,et al.Developing a high-resolution emission inventory of China′s aviation sector using real-world flight trajectory data[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2022,56(9):5743-5752.
[18] ROGERS F,ARNOTT P,ZIELINSKA B,et al.Real-time measurements of jet aircraft engine exhaust[J].Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association,2005,55(5):583-593.
[19] KHOU J C,GHEDHAÏFI W,VANCASSEL X,et al.CFD simulation of contrail formation in the near field of a commercial aircraft:effect of fuel sulfur content[J].Meteorologische Zeitschrift,2017,26(6):585-596.
[20] 周子航,陆成伟,谭钦文,等.成都双流国际机场大气污染物排放清单与时空分布特征[J].中国环境监测,2018,34(3):75-83.
[21] UR RAHMAN E Z,AKBAR F.Aircraft ground support equipment:a framework for maintenance strategies[J].Modern Applied Science,2023,17(2):5539.
[22] 中华人民共和国环境保护部.道路机动车大气污染物排放清单编制技术指南(试行)[EB/OL].(2014-12-31) [2025-08-10].https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201501/W020150107594587831090.pdf.
[23] 中华人民共和国环境保护部.非道路移动源大气污染物排放清单编制技术指南(试行)[EB/OL].(2014-12-31) [2025-08-10].https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201501/W020150107594587960717.pdf.
[24] CARSLAW D C,WILLIAMS M L,TATE J E,et al.The importance of high vehicle power for passenger car emissions[J].Atmospheric Environment,2013,68:8-16.
基本信息:
DOI:
中图分类号:V351.3;X738
引用信息:
[1]杨保华,滕帅,盖永田,等.机场地勤设备排放物的分析方法[J].山东交通学院学报,2025,33(06):53-61.
基金信息:
山东省重点研发计划项目(2024TSGC0440)