nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 06, v.33 15-24
黄河流域物流业绿色发展成熟度评价
基金项目(Foundation): 济南市市校融合战略工程项目(JNSX2023071)
邮箱(Email): 13864130409@126.com;
DOI:
摘要:

为评估黄河流域物流业绿色发展水平,基于成熟度理论,从发展度、协调度和协调发展度3个维度评价物流业绿色发展水平成熟度;以物流业绿色发展水平成熟度为目标层,以经济环境基础、物流供应能力、环境友好水平与技术创新能力为准则层,共选取22项具体指标,构建物流业绿色发展评价指标体系;采用全局熵值法与序关系分析法(G1法)相结合进行指标赋权,通过加权逼近理想解排序法(technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution, TOPSIS)和灰色关联度改进距离协调度模型,计算黄河流域九省区2013—2022年的发展度、协调度和协调发展度。结果表明:2013—2022年,黄河流域物流业的经济环境基础、物流供应能力、环境友好水平和技术创新能力4个子系统的发展度普遍提高,但技术创新能力提高缓慢,制约绿色物流的深入发展;黄河流域各省区的发展度、协调度、协调发展度均呈不同程度的增长,增长趋势由大到小依次为发展度、协调发展度、协调度;四川、内蒙古、陕西、河南及山东的发展度显著增大,其余省区增幅相对较小;协调度整体处于较高水平,但省际差异明显;协调发展度呈下游高、中游平、上游低的阶梯式分布特征;多数省区的协调度高于发展度,反映出协调水平和发展水平存在结构性不匹配。可通过加强中上游地区技术创新与资金支持、强化区域政策协同与资源整合、推进基础设施互联互通与区域协同、建立碳足迹评价与碳交易引导机制,引导物流业低碳转型,实现黄河流域物流业绿色协调发展。

Abstract:

To evaluate the green development level of the logistics industry in the Yellow River Basin, maturity theory is adopted to assess maturity from three dimensions: development degree, coordination degree, and coordinated development degree; with maturity as the target layer and the economic-environmental foundation, logistics supply capacity, environmental friendliness, and technological innovation capability as the criterion layer, 22 specific indicators are selected to construct an evaluation index system for the green development of the logistics industry; indicator weights are determined by combining the global entropy method and the order relation analysis method(G1 method), and the development degree, coordination degree, and coordinated development degree of the nine provinces and autonomous regions in the Yellow River Basin from 2013 to 2022 are calculated using the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS) and a grey relational degree improved distance coordination degree model. The results show that from 2013 to 2022, the development degrees of the four subsystems, namely the economic-environmental foundation, logistics supply capacity, environmental friendliness, and technological innovation capability, generally increase, but technological innovation capability increases slowly, constraining the in-depth development of green logistics; the development degree, coordination degree, and coordinated development degree of the provinces and regions in the Yellow River Basin all show growth to varying extents, with growth trends in descending order of development degree, coordinated development degree, and coordination degree; Sichuan, Inner Mongolia, Shaanxi, Henan, and Shandong exhibit significant increases in development degree, while the increases in the other provinces and regions are relatively small; the coordination degree is overall at a relatively high level, but interprovincial differences are evident; the coordinated development degree presents a stepped distribution pattern of high in the downstream, flat in the midstream, and low in the upstream; in most provinces, the coordination degree is higher than the development degree, reflecting a structural mismatch between the coordination level and the development level. Green and coordinated development of the logistics industry in the Yellow River Basin can be achieved by strengthening technological innovation and financial support in the middle and upper reaches, enhancing regional policy coordination and resource integration, promoting infrastructure interconnection and regional collaboration, and establishing carbon footprint evaluation and carbon trading guidance mechanisms.

参考文献

[1] PEARCE D W,ATKINSON G D.Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development:an indicator of “weak” sustainability[J].Ecological Economics,1993,8(2):103-108.

[2] QIU F D,CHEN Y,TAN J T,et al.Spatial-temporal heterogeneity of green development efficiency and its influencing factors in growing metropolitan area:a case study for the Xuzhou metropolitan area[J].Chinese Geographical Science,2020,30(2):352-365.

[3] 胡鞍钢,周绍杰.绿色发展:功能界定、机制分析与发展战略[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(1):14-20.

[4] 兰兰.区域绿色物流能力评介研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2018.

[5] ALI S S,KAUR R,ERSÖZ F,et al.Measuring carbon performance for sustainable green supply chain practices:a developing country scenario[J].Central European Journal of Operations Research,2020,28(4):1389-1416.

[6] 张珺,邹乔.“双碳”目标视角下物流业绿色转型对流通业高质量发展的影响[J].商业经济研究,2022(5):113-116.

[7] KHAN S A R,ZHANG Y,KUMAR A,et al.Measuring the impact of renewable energy,public health expenditure,logistics,and environmental performance on sustainable economic growth[J].Sustainable Development,2020,28(4):833-843.

[8] 王燊.长江经济带物流业绿色效率评价及对策研究[D].淮南:安徽理工大学,2019.

[9] 孙博行.我国煤炭富集地区物流业绿色效率与影响因素研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古工业大学,2021.

[10] 田云,张姹娜.中国农业能源碳减排成熟度评价及其动态演进[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2023,33(11):57-66.

[11] 孙旭东,李雪松,张博,等.绿色低碳新兴产业成熟度评价方法研究[J].中国工程科学,2020,22(2):98-107.

[12] 张旭,吕明睿,张春雪,等.高质量发展背景下区域绿色物流水平评价及障碍因子[J].经济地理,2023,43(5):139-149.

[13] 徐超毅,齐豫.我国区域物流业绿色发展效率测度和空间分析:以华东地区为例[J].生态经济,2023,39(4):81-88.

[14] 左其亭,杨智楷,张伟,等.黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展研究述评与展望[J].人民黄河,2024,46(9):25-31.

[15] 唐哲,魏修建,陈恒.黄河流域物流业高质量发展水平的时空演变特征[J].统计与决策,2022,38(22):96-101.

[16] 张旭,李沛凝,胡小慧,等.高质量发展下区域绿色物流效率评价研究[J].环境科学与管理,2024,49(4):5-10.

[17] 傅为忠,徐丽君.区域工业绿色发展成熟度动态评价:基于熵值修正G1法和距离协调度改进模型的实证分析[J].工业技术经济,2018,37(3):61-69.

[18] 杨雪,马粟粟,卢亚丽.碳排放约束下的物流效率评价:以“一带一路”背景下内陆十省市为例[J].生态经济,2019,35(6):66-71.

[19] 杨扬,李燕.低碳物流与区域经济耦合协调研究:以云南省为例[J].生态经济,2023,39(6):86-92.

基本信息:

中图分类号:X322;F259.27

引用信息:

[1]周慧慧,陈建岭.黄河流域物流业绿色发展成熟度评价[J].山东交通学院学报,2025,33(06):15-24.

基金信息:

济南市市校融合战略工程项目(JNSX2023071)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文