nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 01, v.34 44-54
大悬臂连续箱梁拓宽桥连接构件的受力特性
基金项目(Foundation): 山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2021ME134)
邮箱(Email): 1300454758@qq.com;
DOI:
摘要:

为研究大悬臂连续箱梁拓宽桥连接构件的受力特性,以女姑口特大桥改造工程为研究背景,采用有限元软件Midas Civil和Abaqus分别对全桥和局部进行精细化数值模拟,分析横向拓宽桥整体模型在部分受力、恒载组合、运营状态3种工况下的受力情况及拓宽前后桥梁所受弯矩变化,分析局部构件模型在运营状态下所受应力。对箱梁和横肋进行实桥应变监测,对比分析实测应力与有限元模型分析应力。运营状态为最不利工况,在此工况下,左、右幅箱梁的应力极值均位于第2跨与第15跨跨中区域。取出现最大应力和最大竖向位移的第15跨建立局部精细化模型,加载后分析横肋、榫卯、套箍在运营状态工况下的应力,横肋顺桥向、横桥向压应力对称分布,顺桥向应力从两端向中部区域递减,端部最大压应力为-5.40 MPa,最大拉应力为0.42 MPa,横桥向应力从中部向两端递减,中部最大压应力为-5.50 MPa,最大拉应力为0.39 MPa。运营状态工况下,榫卯连接钢筋的应力极值出现在靠近横肋侧壁中部区域,5~#榫卯承受最大应力21.56 MPa;套箍应力对称分布,顺桥向两侧竖向钢筋中部区域出现应力极值,4~#套箍承受最大应力71.43 MPa, 10~#套箍承受最小应力35.65 MPa。拓宽后的桥梁结构整体刚度增大,荷载传递路径变化,原主梁在运营状态工况下的弯矩分布明显改变,正弯矩区最大弯矩普遍减小,负弯矩区最大弯矩的绝对值小幅增大。第15跨左箱梁的顶板和底板纵向实测应力与有限元模型应力相近,横肋底面实测应力与有限元模型应力在L/4、L/2、3L/4处相差较大。

Abstract:

To study the force characteristics of the connection components of the large cantilever continuous box girder widening bridge, taking the Nügukou Bridge reconstruction project as the research background, fine numerical simulations of the entire bridge and local sections are conducted with finite element software Midas Civil and Abaqus. The stress conditions of the overall model of the widening bridge under three working conditions: partial load, constant load combination, and operational state are analyzed, along with the changes in bending moments before and after widening the bridge. The stress on the local component model is analyzed under operational conditions. Strain monitoring is performed on the box girder and transverse ribs, and a comparative analysis of the measured stresses and the stresses obtained from the finite element model is conducted. The operational state is the most unfavorable condition, under which the stress extremes of the left and right box girders are located in the middle regions of the 2nd and 15th spans. A local refined model is established for the 15th span, which exhibits the maximum stress and vertical displacement. After loading, the stresses on the transverse ribs, mortises, and stirrups are analyzed under the operational state. The compressive stresses of the transverse ribs in the longitudinal and transverse directions exhibit a symmetric distribution, with longitudinal stresses decreasing from the ends toward the middle region. The maximum compressive stress at the ends is-5.40 MPa, and the maximum tensile stress is 0.42 MPa. The transverse compressive stresses decrease from the middle to the ends, with the maximum compressive stress in the middle being-5.50 MPa and the maximum tensile stress being 0.39 MPa. Under the operational state, the extreme values of stress for the reinforcement in the mortise connections appear in the middle region near the side walls of the transverse ribs, with the 5~# mortise bearing the maximum stress of 21.56 MPa. The stirrup stresses exhibit a symmetric distribution, with extreme stresses occurring in the middle regions of the vertical reinforcements on both sides. The 4~# stirrup bears the maximum stress of 71.43 MPa, while the 10~# stirrup bears the minimum stress of 35.65 MPa. The overall stiffness of the bridge structure increases after widening, with changes in the load transfer path. The bending moment distribution of the original main beam under operational conditions is significantly altered, with the maximum bending moment in the positive moment region generally decreasing, while the absolute value of the maximum bending moment in the negative moment region slightly increases. The measured longitudinal stresses of the top and bottom plates of the left box girder in the 15th span are close to those of the finite element model, while the measured stresses on the bottom surface of the transverse ribs differ significantly from the finite element model stresses at L/4, L/2, and 3L/4.

参考文献

[1] 交通运输部.2022年交通运输行业发展统计公报[N].中国交通报,2023-06-16 (002).

[2] 高倩,李旭杰,潘少军,等.一种智能化数据采集设备在桥梁测试中的应用[J].测控技术,2017,36(9):24-26.

[3] SHUSHKEWICH K W.Design of prestressed concrete bridges to accommodate future widening[J].PCI Journal,2005,50(3):74-89.

[4] CORBETT P W,WATTERSON T J.Widening of existing bridges on state highway 16 in Auckland[J].Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-bridge Engineering,2016,169(3):203-214.

[5] 李顺波,宋宇飞.既有桥梁拼宽方案分析与对比[J].低温建筑技术,2021,43(2):94-95.

[6] 翟建勋.大悬臂混凝土箱梁桥横向拓宽拼接加劲肋的设计研究[D].南京:东南大学,2016.

[7] 吴文清,赵昊,章世祥.三向预应力混凝土箱梁桥拓宽改造箱梁翼缘板连接结构研究[J].桥梁建设,2020,50(2):13-18.

[8] 柴晓婷.连续弯箱梁桥拓宽后拼接缝受力及平面内结构变形研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2023.

[9] 陈康明,吴庆雄,陈宝春,等.长联预应力混凝土连续梁桥拼接问题分析[J].广西大学学报(自然科学版),2016,41(4):1238-1245.

[10] WU W Q,ZHANG H,LIU Z,et al.Numerical analysis on transverse splicing structure for the widening of a long multi-span highway concrete continuous box girder bridge[J].Materials,2022,15(19):6805.

[11] TAN Z C,YU J C,ZHANG S Y.A multi-technique hybrid method for the widening and splicing of new and old beam bridges[J].Sustainability,2024,16(14):6164.

[12] 杨新燕.桥梁T梁与箱梁斜向拼接结构受力性能有限元分析[J].水利与建筑工程学报,2022,20(5):178-184.

[13] 谭小磊.基于有限元的混凝土连续箱梁拼宽桥拼接段受力性能模拟分析 [J].科学技术创新,2023(5):125-128.

[14] 刘发,厉广广,杨洋,等.基于长标距光纤光栅应变传感体系的拼宽桥梁动态变形现场测试[J].公路,2024,69(9):117-123.

[15] GUO Q,SUN Y B,MI T.Retracted:assessment on long-term deflection of concrete beam bridges based on uncertainty quantification method[J].Structures,2021,34:3013-3027.

[16] 杨忠胜.既有拼宽T梁桥连接方式优化研究[J].世界桥梁,2021,49 (4):106-111.

[17] WU W Q,CAO C,WU Y Q,et al.Numerical analysis on sliding-type transverse splicing connection applied in widening continuous concrete box-girder bridge[J].Buildings,2024,15(1):35.

[18] 高士亮.新旧桥梁拓宽拼接力学行为研究[J].工程建设与设计,2021(20):58-60.

[19] 张炎.加宽装配式简支空心板梁桥荷载横向分布系数探讨[J].黑龙江科学,2023,14(2):44-46.

[20] 中华人民共和国交通运输部.公路钢筋混凝土及预应力混凝土桥涵设计规范:JTG 3362—2018[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2018.

基本信息:

中图分类号:U441

引用信息:

[1]杨安畅,孟松,巩冠宏,等.大悬臂连续箱梁拓宽桥连接构件的受力特性[J].山东交通学院学报,2026,34(01):44-54.

基金信息:

山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2021ME134)

发布时间:

2025-12-08

出版时间:

2025-12-08

网络发布时间:

2025-12-08

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文